Can something be done about the web version of the "document marking" tool? I use this feature to make comments on student papers. It groups all the markings together. It also won't let me erase just one thing (eraser function on my sim pen won't work) … I have to delete the whole comment (may have 5-7 pieces of comments in it) then redo it all. It's not efficient.
I also have difficulty using the markup in SpeedGrader on a Surface. My work-around has been to use the options to bulk download the submissions, mark them up outside of Canvas, and then re-upload them as feedback files. It can be a bit of acrobatics to enter the score, rubric, and/or assignment comments in Canvas while marking up in Word, Acrobat, etc., so I usually also set the assignment to hide the grades until after my re-upload of feedback files.
Unfortunately, that's not very helpful! I know it's a workaround, but I shouldn't have to go through more work to grade assignments that should be able to be done using the functionality of the platform. I would hope that there would be a fix to the issue rather than having faculty find creative ways to do their jobs in a more straight-forward way.
Enhance your access to articles, forums, and events—and to participate by sharing insights, engaging in discussions, and connecting with your network of edtech peers.
There should be a way to ignore a student's attempt without adding an extra attempt. I want to be able to ignore when the student uploads the wrong file, or starts a quiz and experiences a power outage. Adding an extra attempt isn't accurate and providing a grade and feedback, then reassigning is a slow process.
Cordial saludo Actualmente estamos presentando una inconsistencia en New Quizzes al momento de realizar la migración y posterior edición de las evaluaciones. Específicamente, al intentar modificar una pregunta y eliminar una de sus opciones de respuesta, el sistema no permite ejecutar dicha acción. Con el fin de descartar…
Our institution is setting up 9 institutional outcomes in Canvas. Several of our outcomes have multiple skill sets within the rubric. For example: Critical Reading – Skill Set A Critical Reading – Skill Set B Critical Reading – Skill Set C Our understanding is that Canvas Outcomes data reports can provide the overall/total…
I am just curiousas to why there is not a field to enter a description for an outcome at the account level? Or at least edit the rating when you attach/link an account level outcome to a rubric. When you create a new criterion for a rubric, you enter a decription for a rating, but for an account level outcome.
We use a pre- post- model to measure learning which requires student-question matching from two time periods. This requires exporting quiz data to CSV to do the analysis properly. (I can get into more detail if needed.) The New Quizzes Student Analysis CSV export has repeated blocks of ItemID then columns related to that…
